Follow by Email

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Ohio Prisoners Declare Victory After Three Day Hunger Strike Inspired by Occupy Oakland

From Occupy Oakland:  http://occupyoakland.org/2012/02/ohio-prisoners-declare-victory-after-three-day-hunger-strike-inspired-by-occupy-oakland/


By Monday evening, the prisoners had decided to issue demands and continue refusing food. Their demands included specific changes in the conditions of their confinement at the Ohio State Penitentiary (OSP), as well as calls for broader reforms. They resumed eating after Warden David Bobby agreed to grant a number of their demands including:

1. Reversing the recent decision to reduce outdoor recreation time for prisoners to a schedule alternating between 3 and 4 hours per week.

2. Improving enrichment programs, including new movies and religious movies for the prison television station.

3. Bringing the head dietitian from the central office in Columbus to review OSP food policies and hear prisoner complaints about inedible and scorched food.

4. A number of specific instances of price-gouging, skimping, and lack of variety in the commissary.

Hasan said, “Warden Bobby has been a man of his word in the past, so we don’t anticipate the kind of situation going on in California,” referring to the slow response to negotiations during last year’s large prisoner hunger strikes in California. The prisoners consider their hunger strike a victory because they won these specific demands and also because they helped raise awareness of state and even nationwide issues regarding the artificial economy of state pay and commissary prices. Prisoners from across the institution participated in the hunger strike, including Siddique Abdullah Hasan, a Muslim Imam who has been on death row fighting what he says is a wrongful conviction following the 1993 Lucasville Uprising.

**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org

New Ban on Solitary Confinement for Child Prisoners in Mississippi

From Solitary Watch:  http://solitarywatch.com/2012/02/29/new-ban-on-solitary-confinement-for-child-prisoners-in-mississippi/

February 29, 2012 by

The United States, alone among industrialized nations, incarcerates thousands of juveniles in adult prisons, after trying and sentencing them as adults. We also lead the world in the practice of solitary confinement.

These two facts have come together to create a horrifying reality: hundreds of children languishing in isolation cells.

This week, the American Civil Liberties Union and Southern Poverty Law Center announced that after years of litigation, they had reached an agreement with the state of Mississippi that will end juvenile solitary confinement in its prisons. According to a post on the ACLU’s “Blog of Rights”:
On March 22, 2012, a federal court in Jackson, Mississippi, will enter a groundbreaking consent decree, believed to be the first of its kind in the nation, banning the horrendous practice of subjecting kids convicted as adults to solitary confinement…While in solitary, the youth are held in almost complete isolation and sensory deprivation with virtually no human contact, without books, paper or pens, radios, pictures, access to television or any kind of recreational activity, and are denied all visits, telephone calls and even mail from their families. If prison staff tags a kid as suicidal — which they often do with punitive motives — that kid is stripped naked except for a paper gown and denied a mattress.

It’s been known for a long time that prolonged solitary confinement inflicts intense suffering, worsens pre-existing mental illness and causes psychiatric breakdown even in mature healthy adults — let alone in emotionally vulnerable kids. International law recognizes that solitary confinement can rise to torture and, furthermore, that kids under the age of 18 are particularly vulnerable to the damaging effects of solitary. These effects are so well understood that international law now prohibits solitary confinement of any person under the age of 18, strongly condemning it as a form of cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.
According to the Jackson Clarion Ledger, the groups’ lawsuit, filed in November 2010, challenged what it called “brutal, unconstitutional conditions” at Mississippi’s Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility.

WGYCF, which houses male prisoners ages 13 to 22, is operated by the GEO Group, America’s second largest private prison company. In addition to placing kids in solitary confinement, the suit alleges that “guards beat inmates, smuggled drugs to the youths and engaged in sexual acts with them,” as well as allowing older inmates to prey on younger ones. In an incident two years ago, 14 young inmates were injured, including one who suffered brain damage. The consent degree announced this week will also ban the placement of juveniles at WGYCF.

**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org
Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Citizens-for-Prison-Reform/171253319587634

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

The Vanishing Mind, Life with Dementia

From The New York Times:  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/26/health/dealing-with-dementia-among-aging-criminals.html?_r=1&emc=eta1

By PAM BELLUCK February 26, 2012

SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. — Secel Montgomery Sr. stabbed a woman in the stomach, chest and throat so fiercely that he lost count of the wounds he inflicted. In the nearly 25 years he has been serving a life sentence, he has gotten into fights, threatened a prison official and been caught with marijuana.

Despite that, he has recently been entrusted with an extraordinary responsibility. He and other convicted killers at the California Men’s Colony help care for prisoners with Alzheimer’s disease and other types of dementia, assisting ailing inmates with the most intimate tasks: showering, shaving, applying deodorant, even changing adult diapers.

Their growing roster of patients includes Joaquin Cruz, a convicted killer who is now so addled that he thinks he sees his brother in the water of a toilet, and Walter Gregory, whose short-term memory is ebbing even as he vividly recalls his crime: stabbing and mutilating his girlfriend with a switchblade.

“I cut her eyes out, too,” Mr. Gregory declared recently.

Dementia in prison is an underreported but fast-growing phenomenon, one that many prisons are desperately unprepared to handle. It is an unforeseen consequence of get-tough-on-crime policies — long sentences that have created a large population of aging prisoners. About 10 percent of the 1.6 million inmates in America’s prisons are serving life sentences; another 11 percent are serving over 20 years.

And more older people are being sent to prison. In 2010, 9,560 people 55 and older were sentenced, more than twice as many as in 1995. In that same period, inmates 55 and older almost quadrupled, to nearly 125,000, a Human Rights Watch report found.

While no one has counted cognitively impaired inmates, experts say that prisoners appear more prone to dementia than the general population because they often have more risk factors: limited education, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, depression, substance abuse, even head injuries from fights and other violence.

Many states consider over-50 prisoners elderly, saying they age up to 15 years faster.
With many prisons already overcrowded and understaffed, inmates with dementia present an especially difficult challenge. They are expensive — medical costs for older inmates range from three to nine times as much as those for younger inmates. They must be protected from predatory prisoners. And because dementia makes them paranoid or confused, feelings exacerbated by the confines of prison, some attack staff members or other inmates, or unwittingly provoke fights by wandering into someone else’s cell.

“The dementia population is going to grow tremendously,” says Ronald H. Aday, a sociologist and the author of “Aging Prisoners: Crisis in American Corrections.” “How are we going to take care of them?”

Some prison systems are confronting that now. Many would like to transfer demented inmates to nursing homes, but their often-violent crimes make states reluctant to parole them and nursing homes reluctant to take them.

New York has taken the top-dollar route, establishing a separate unit for cognitively impaired inmates and using professional caregivers, at a cost of about $93,000 per bed annually, compared with $41,000 in the general prison population. Pennsylvania and other states are giving mental health workers special dementia training.

But some struggling prison systems, including those in Louisiana and California, are taking a less expensive but potentially riskier approach. They are training prisoners to handle many of the demented inmates’ daily needs.

“Yeah, they did something horrible to end up here,” said Cheryl Steed, a psychologist at the California Men’s Colony, where prisoners who help inmates with dementia are called Gold Coats because their yellow jackets contrast with the standard-issue blue. But without them, she said, “we wouldn’t be able to care for our dementia patients very well.”

After escorting Joaquin Cruz to an appointment, James Evers, a Gold Coat, was returning him to their adobe-colored cellblock when they encountered corrections officers strip-searching inmates for missing tools.

Mr. Cruz, 60, who barely recalls that he is in prison for killing someone who sold him fake cocaine, grew confused and resistant when guards tried searching him. “He has Alzheimer’s,” Mr. Evers managed to explain. “It’s not that he’s refusing to do what you’re asking.”

At the prison, shadowed by seacoast mountains, Gold Coats are paid $50 a month and have better knowledge of impaired prisoners’ conditions than many prison guards. Gold Coats, trained by the Alzheimer’s Association and given thick manuals on dementia, were the first to notice when Mr. Cruz began putting his boots on the wrong feet and “started pulling down his pants and going to the bathroom wherever he was,” said Phillip Burdick, a Gold Coat who is serving a life sentence for beating a man to death with a hammer.

Gold Coats report these changes, often at weekly support group meetings with Dr. Steed. They identify “different tricks and strategies to get guys to do what they need to do,” she said.

Before the program was started in 2009, demented inmates frequently caused fights, hitting those they considered threatening or disturbing other prisoners by encroaching on their turf. “The whole atmosphere was hostile,” said Bettina Hodel, a psychologist who started the program and once narrowly avoided being struck herself. Now, Gold Coats absorb much of that behavior.

**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org

Citizens for Prison Reform Montly Meeting March 17th

CITIZENS FOR PRISON REFORM IS HOSTING:

A meeting for prisoner families; loved ones and individuals interested in working to reform Michigans prison system.


Date:  Saturday March 17, 2012


Location: West Lansing Church of Christ
5505
W. St. Joe Hwy
Lansing, MI 48917



Time: 10:15 a.m. Registration and Sign-in (Park and enter at the back side of
Church)

Meeting: 10:30 a.m. -12:30 p.m.

Letter Writing Campaign Workshop:  Please bring supplies necessary to write letters, i.e., laptop (a printer will be supplied), envelopes, stamps, pens, paper to do handwritten letters if preferred. 
This letter campaign is our next step to bring greater awareness of the need for prison reform.  Our goal will be to reach national organizations, our Congressmen in D.C., and local legislative members and organizations.  We will provide the necessary information and offer support as we write together. 
A letter campaign to ask for fair and just sentencing of a Lansing juvenile will also take place during this time.  See the attached information.
12:30- Lunch following for those who wish to join at Bennigans off
Saginaw Hwy
at
718 Delta Commerce Dr
.
Questions: Contact 269-339-0606 or citizensforprisonreform@yahoo.com

RSVP for the upcoming meeting by:  Thursday March 14, at the above contacts.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Illinois Governor Proposes Closing Controversial Tamms Supermax Prison

From Solitary Watch:  http://solitarywatch.com/2012/02/22/illinois-governor-proposes-closing-controversial-tamms-supermax-prison/

by Jean Casella and James Ridgeway
February 22, 2012
 
In a budget briefing held this afternoon, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn proposed closing the state’s notorious Tamms supermax prison. The proposal is part of a package of deep spending cuts to nearly all areas of state government, which Quinn called a “rendezvous with reality.”

Tamms holds more than 200 prisoners in long-term solitary confinement in conditions that have been denounced as torturous. Prisoners at Tamms spend at least 23 hours a day locked down in small cells, leaving them only to shower or to exercise alone in a concrete pen. They are fed through slots in their cell doors, and are allowed no communal activities, no phone calls, and no contact visits.

As in most supermax prisons, a high percentage of prisoners at Tamms suffer from serious mental illness, and for them the torment is even worse. In its 14-year history, Tamms has witnessed inmate suicides, suicide attempts, and self-mutilations.

When it opened in 1998, Tamms was purported to be a short-term solution for prisoners with disciplinary problems. Yet ten years later, a third of the original prisoners were still there, held in solitary for more than a decade.

In addition to its human costs, incarcerating prisoners at Tamms is also extraordinarily expensive: According to one calculation, the cost of keeping an inmate in the supermax exceeds $92,000 per year–two to three times the cost of the state’s other maximum security prisons.

With Illinois several years into a serious fiscal crisis, the immediate impetus for the proposed closure of Tamms is clearly financial. But years of activism and litigation, along with  scathing press exposes, undoubtedly helped sway the state to put Tamms on the chopping block.

Grassroots advocacy, spearheaded by the group Tamms Year Ten, began in earnest in 2008, on the tenth anniversary of Tamms’ opening. In addition to mounting various educational and organizing efforts, the Tamms Year Ten campaign exerted pressure on state legislators, the governor, and the Illinois Department of Corrections–which in 2009 announced a “ten-point plan” for reforming the supermax. Subsequently, however, the head of the IDOC was pushed out, and most of the reforms were never implemented.

The movement gained traction, nonetheless, as a result of a series of investigations by reporters at the Belleville News-Democrat, which released its series “Trapped in Tamms” in August 2009. The series portrayed a nightmarish place where sane prisoners were driven mad, and where those with underlying mental illness suffered daily as a result of their extreme isolation.

In 2010, following a ten-year legal battle by Chicago’s Uptown People’s Law Center, a federal judge ruled that inmates at Tamms were being denied their Constitutional rights by being placed in long-term solitary without any semblance of due process. The same judge found that the “crushing monotony” and total deprivation of human contact were likely to “inflict lasting psychological damage and emotional harm on inmates confined there for long periods.”

Alan Mills of the Uptown People’s Law Center told Solitary Watch that in combination with the pressure from advocates, the legal case “gave the imprimatur of a federal judge to our long-time contention that long term isolation at Tamms inflicts serious harm on men’s minds—harm that continues even after they are released from Tamms.” In addition, said Mills, ”by finally requiring the Department [of Corrections] to provide meaningful due process hearings to determine why each man was at Tamms” it forced the DOC to realize ”that many of the prisoners who had spent years there, really didn’t need to be there. They transferred over 25 men out of Tamms as a result of this review process. I am guessing that during these reviews the Department began to seriously question what the real criteria should be for placement at Tamms—and ultimately decided it wasn’t worth it.” Finally, “All of this was crystallized by the desperate need to save money somewhere.”

Prisoner advocates were today affirming Quinn’s decision to promote the closure of Tamms, calling it “long overdue.” Tamms Year Ten leader Laurie Jo Reynolds told the Belleville News Democrat: “From the day it opened, Tamms has been a financial boondoggle and a human rights catastrophe. The staff to prisoner ratio is the highest in the system and the mental health worker to prisoner ratio is vastly higher…Because men can’t work or leave the cell, we just pay for excess correctional staff to shackle them, move them around, and push food into their cells. Then we pay to treat them when they become insane due to the isolation.”
But they also warned that the closure of Tamms is far from accomplished, and will face resistance from a number of directions–including not only corrections officials and unions and Republican legislators, but also Democrats from the southern tip of the state where Tamms is located. According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, “The rumored Tamms closure was drawing heavy criticism from Southern Illinois legislators throughout the day Tuesday. The criticism was directed at Quinn, a Chicagoan. ‘I’m mad as hell. I don’t know where this guy is coming from,’ state Sen. Gary Forby, D-Benton, wrote in a Twitter feed.”

Advocates urged backers of the Tamms closure to immediately contact the governor’s office to state their support for the plan.

**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org

Out of Eden: when the private prison bubble bursts

From The Guardian:    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/feb/22/eden-private-prison-bubble-bursts?newsfeed=true

By  

Friday, February 24, 2012

Use of Tasers in Michigan prisons praised by corrections officials

From the Detroit Free Press:  http://www.freep.com/article/20120223/NEWS06/202230568/Use-of-Tasers-in-Michigan-prisons-praised-by-corrections-officials

February 23, 2012  by Paul Egan

(Member Lois DeMott quoted in article)

LANSING -- Michigan corrections officers say a recent experiment carrying Tasers is a success, but a planned cost-cutting measure -- eliminating round-the-clock patrols of prison perimeters -- is a threat to prison security.

Department of Corrections Director Dan Heyns and Michigan Corrections Organization officials are in rare agreement about the use of Tasers, which began in late December as a pilot project in five of the state's 31 prisons.

But Heyns and the union are at odds over his plan to save about $15 million by scaling back vehicle patrols around the prisons' exteriors.

Heyns described the use of Tasers as "a game changer" in testimony Tuesday to state lawmakers.
"We're seeing a dramatic drop in the number of assaults," Heyns said. Prisoners "are going to think twice before they take on a staff member."

Mel Grieshaber, executive director of the Michigan Corrections Organization, which pushed to allow officers to carry the electric stun guns, agreed the devices are having a positive impact.

Russ Marlan, a spokesman for the corrections department, said comparative assault statistics are not yet available, but anecdotal evidence from wardens suggest just the threat of Taser use can restore order.

Since December, officers have drawn Tasers 59 times and fired them 39 times at Carson City Correctional Facility, Ionia Correctional Facility, Alger Correctional Facility, the Michigan Reformatory and St. Louis Correctional Facility, he said.

However, some still have concerns.

Lois DeMott, a co-founder of the advocacy group Citizens for Prison Reform, said she's particularly worried about Tasers being used on prisoners with mental illnesses or disabilities.

"I believe there are better methods that can be utilized," DeMott said.

In another area, Grieshaber said Heyns' plan to scale back 24-hour perimeter patrols creates risks for more escapes and the smuggling of guns and other contraband into prisons.

Marlan said officers who patrol the exteriors full-time would split those duties with working the information desk. It's still a proposal, but it could be implemented in the next two months, he said.

Scaled-back patrols would be supplemented with greater use of cameras and motion detectors, among other measures, Marlan said.

But Grieshaber said patrols have stopped friends and relatives of prisoners from smuggling in contraband.

"We know for a fact that folks throw a tennis ball, for example, over a fence, filled with dope," Grieshaber said. "We've had guns thrown over the fence."

The prisons already deploy cameras and motion detectors around their exteriors, he said.

Although Marlan said the plan is still a proposal, Grieshaber said he and Heyns discussed it, and Heyns left no doubt about his intentions. "He told us he's moving forward," he said.

Contact Paul Egan: 517-372-8660 or pegan@freepress.com

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org


Faith-based Prison Units

From Prison Fellowship International:  http://www.pfi.org/issues/faith-based-prison-units

Communities of Restoration are an alternative approach to prisoner rehabilitation and prison management. COR is a values-based re-entry programme which starts in the prison but then walks with the participant during the difficult transition back into the community by providing mentoring and support.

A number of Prison Fellowship Affiliates operate faith-based prison units as an alternative approach to prisoner rehabilitation and prison management. These in-prison communities foster the spiritual and moral regeneration of prisoners by helping them understand their own human dignity as well as that of others around them. From this foundation, prisoners assume responsibility for themselves and seek to contribute to the lives of others.

 Communities of Restoration (COR) are 24-hour, 7-day-a-week, intensive prison regimes operated by Prison Fellowship. They focus on restoration of offenders to themselves, their families, their victims, their communities and their creator by allowing them to experience and participate in responsible, supportive and caring relationships.


How It Began

Thirty-five years ago, a small group of professionals, business people and retirees in the suburbs of Sao Paolo, Brazil, began visiting prisoners in their city to attend to their medical, psychological, educational, vocational and spiritual needs.

The result was the "APAC Methodology", named after their organization in Brazil, Associacao de Protecao e Assistencia aos Condenados ("Association for Protection and Assistance of Convicts"). This methodology was so effective that government officials began turning entire prisons over to them to operate. News spread to other countries and the approach has now been adapted and replicated throughout Latin America, North America, Europe, and the Pacific. Prison Fellowship International refers to APAC and its replications as Communities of Restoration.

How It Works

  • The programmes typically occupy a special unit or wing within a prison.
  • Participants volunteer to be part of the programme after receiving an orientation in the nature and focus of the programme.
While COR is "faith-based" (Christian ecumenical), it is open to persons of any or no faith. All that is required is that the individual be willing to respect the values and to explore the implications of Christianity as a response to the spiritual nature of humans. They are not required to be Christians to enter - or to graduate from 0 the programme.

The most developed CORs advance through three phases:
  1. Phase One: Prisoners learn to live in community. They engage in creative work, and begin to reflect spiritually on their lives. Trained volunteers and administrative staff assess their needs and abilities and create tailored plans with the prisoners.
  2. Phase Two: Prisoners are given opportunities to serve others. They help administer and maintain the facility, teach other prisoners, and serve in a variety of leadership positions. They engage in productive work in prison industries as part of their preparation for eventual freedom.
  3. Phase Three: Prisoners work in the community during the day and return to prison at night. This allows them to confront real-world challenges and temptations while they still have a supportive community in the COR.
This support does not end with their release. Volunteers are in regular contact as the inmates make the transition to contributing members of society.

Success Rates

Several promising studies affirm the success of the APAC methodology. One used records from the original APAC facility, Humaita Prison. Two others were related to the first Community of Restoration in the United States, called the InnerChange Freedom Initiative (IFI) program.

The first study compared the re-arrest rates of Humaita prisoners over three years with those from another model prison. It found that only 5% a year were re-arrested, half the rate of the other model. Those who did get in trouble had fewer arrests and were less likely to be locked up again than the other group.

In 2003, two reports were released based on a six-year study of the IFI programme in Texas. Both found that prisoners who completed the program had significantly lowered recidivism rates than did comparison groups.


**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org



CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT PFI'S FAITH-BASED PRISON UNITS AND WHERE THEY ARE RUNNING

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Deal reached on treatment of state’s mentally ill inmates

From boston.com:  http://articles.boston.com/2012-02-16/metro/31063728_1_mental-illness-inmate-suicides-segregation-units

February 16, 2012|By Milton J. Valencia

Years after a series of suicides in state prison segregation units, the state Department of Correction has reached a landmark agreement with advocate groups to better care for prisoners with severe mental illnesses.

The agreement, still under seal in US District Court in Boston and awaiting a judge’s final approval, calls for the Department of Correction to maintain two recently created units at high-level security prisons as alternatives to disciplinary segregation for prisoners with mental illness, according to court records and negotiations in a recent court hearing.

A Secure Treatment Program with 19 beds would be maintained at the Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center in Shirley, providing inmates with mental health care while under tight security. A 10-bed Behavior Management Unit at MCI Cedar Junction in Walpole would address needs of mentally ill patients with chronic disciplinary problems.

Both programs were started following a lawsuit filed by the Disability Law Center on behalf of prisoners with mental illness, and after a Globe Spotlight series found that inadequate care for mentally ill prisoners often resulted in inmate suicides.

The department reported 15 inmate suicides from 2005-2007.

“This provides, and is already providing, meaningful, workable, and appropriate alternatives to isolation,’’

Robert Fleischner, a lawyer for the Disability Law Center, said in open court recently. “There is a time out of cell, and therapy, that is not available to units in the disciplinary unit.’’

The Department of Correction has agreed to sustain the new units as part of the deal.

The agreement has been signed by representatives of the Disability Law Center and the Department of Correction, but has not been approved by the federal court.

The Correction Department has also promised to develop procedures for screening and evaluation of inmates in segregation units, to determine whether they suffer from severe mental illness.

In addition, the department agreed to restrict placement of inmates with mental illness into segregation units. The department will better train staff and assess inmates in need of care.

The changes are being made to a system that in years past would discipline prisoners with severe mental illnesses by sending them to a segregation unit, where they stayed in isolation for 23 hours a day.
“That exacerbates their illness . . . That is deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition,’’ Fleischner said in court.

State officials said they could not comment on the deal pending its approval, but added in a statement, “The Department of Correction takes the well-being of its mentally ill inmates seriously and looks forward to the judgment of the courts in the near future.’’

**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org

AFSC: PEOPLE OF FAITH AGAINST PRIVATE PRISONS SIGN-ON STATEMENT

From American Friends Service Committee:  http://support.afsc.org/site/Survey?ACTION_REQUIRED=URI_ACTION_USER_REQUESTS&SURVEY_ID=3623

People of Faith Against Private Prisons in Michigan

As many of you are aware, the Michigan House is getting ready to vote on HB 5174 and 5177.  We believe it is critical for people of faith to speak out against the move to create private prisons in Michigan.

We are asking that you and/or your congregation sign on to the following brief statement in opposition to private prisons in Michigan.

The text of the statement follows and you can 
SIGN ON HERE.  We intend to circulate the signed statement to key legislators, and to continue to collect signatures even if the bills should pass. Regardless of what happens with the vote, we want to express strong opposition to privatization of prisons in MI.     


 
  • We believe in the inherent worth of every human being and so we stand opposed to the privatization of prisons and jails.
  • We stand against the punishment of human beings as a profit-making venture.
  • We question whether those in the business of incarceration, where profit, not justice, is the bottom line, can operate a correctional facility in the best interest of justice and the public good.
  • We oppose transferring any of Michigan prisons or people held in public prisons, to a private corporation.
 
As people of faith and as people of good will, we stand opposed to for-profit prisons and detention centers and strongly urge the elected representatives and appointed officials of Michigan to find alternatives to the conversion of its prisons from the public to the private sector.


**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org





Wednesday, February 22, 2012

"The Gray Box": An Investigation of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons

From The Crime Report:  http://www.thecrimereport.org/news/inside-criminal-justice/2012-02-dart-society-report-on-solitary-confinement

Friday, February 17, 2012

The box. That's the name for the solitary confinement cell where as many as 80,000 U.S. prisoners live in seclusion.

A new multi-media report by the Dart Society offers an intimate portrait of the men who live in those cells, often confined 23 hours a day to a cell the size of two queen-sized mattresses. Some stay for a few weeks. Others, for decades. 

"It's a wasteland," says one inmate. "The gray box is a wasteland."

The investigation by Denver-based journalist Susan Greene includes interviews with inmates, prison officials and advocates for an unusually human look at criminal justice policy. Greene's report won an award this month from the Sidney Hillman Foundation.

Watch the full report, and read additional material from the investigation.

Court Rules 2010 Bodyke Decision Did Not Eliminate Judicial Review of 'Adam Walsh Act' Sex Offender Classifications

From Congress, Court & Decisions:  http://congress-courts-legislation.blogspot.com/2012/02/court-rules-2010-bodyke-decision-did.html

Feb 21, 2010

The Supreme Court of Ohio held today that its 2010 decision in State v. Bodyke, which invalidated part of the Ohio Adam Walsh Act (AWA) as unconstitutional, did not invalidate the statutory petition process by which a sex offender may seek judicial review of his classification. The Court also held that when a trial court finds that a defendant who has been indicted for failing to register as a sex offender under the AWA is not a person subject to registration, the trial court has authority to grant a pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment.

The court’s 7-0 decision, authored by Justice Yvette McGee Brown, reversed rulings by the 10th District Court of Appeals.

The case involved Paul Palmer of Columbus, who pleaded guilty to sexual battery in 1995, served a prison term for that offense, and was released from prison prior to the July 1, 2007 effective date of Ohio’s first comprehensive sex offender registration law enacted as Megan’s Law. Under Megan’s Law, persons like Palmer who completed their prison sentences before July 1, 1997, were not subject to classification as sex offenders or to the law’s registration or community notification provisions.

In 2007, the General Assembly enacted the Ohio Adam Walsh Act, which replaced Megan’s Law with a more stringent sex offender classification scheme. Under the AWA, all former sex offenders were subject to classification into one of three “tiers” based on their offenses regardless of when their offense was committed. Palmer was notified that, based on his 1995 sexual battery conviction, he had been classified as a Tier III (most dangerous) offender and as such would be required to register with law enforcement in his county of residence and county of employment every 90 days for the rest of his life, and also was subject to community notification requirements.

Palmer filed a petition in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas under a provision of the AWA, R.C. 2250.031(E), that entitled classified sex offenders to “a court hearing to contest the application to the offender of the new registration requirements.” While that petition remained pending, a grand jury indicted Palmer on felony counts of failing to verify his current address and failing to report a change of address as required by the AWA.

Palmer filed a motion asking the trial court to dismiss the indictment, and to rule immediately on his pending petition challenging his classification under the AWA. The trial court ruled that Ohio’s sex-offender regulations did not apply to Palmer, and granted his motion to dismiss the indictment. Additionally, the trial court ordered the removal of Palmer’s name from any “local, state or federal” lists of sex offenders.

The state appealed, and on review the 10th District Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s rulings.

As a preliminary matter, the 10th District concluded that the trial court exceeded its authority when it dismissed the indictment because it looked to “evidence outside the face of the indictment” and “address[ed] the very issue to be determined at trial.” Additionally, the 10th District found the dismissal erroneous in light of the language of the AWA explicitly applying its provisions retroactively to all past sex offenders regardless of the date of their offense. Finally, the appellate court reversed the trial court order requiring Palmer’s removal from lists of sex offenders because the order stemmed from the erroneous determination that the requirements of the AWA did not apply to Palmer. ..For the remainder of this opinion: by Ohio Supreme Court.


**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org
Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Citizens-for-Prison-Reform/171253319587634

Smart, not tough: Reconsidering juvenile justice

From Bridge Magazine:  http://bridgemi.com/2012/02/smart-not-tough-reconsidering-juvenile-justice/

21 February 2012
By Pat Shellenbarger/Bridge Magazine contributor
As he looked around at the mix of politicians and social activists about to announce their support for reducing the number of people in Ohio’s prisons, Mike Brickner was struck by a revelation. He and other officials of the American Civil Liberties Union Ohio chapter had found common ground with politicians spanning the entire political spectrum.

“Oh, my gosh,” Brickner, the Ohio ACLU’s director of communications, said some months later, “if you can get the ACLU and the most conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats — people who usually can’t agree on anything — to come together, then you can get some momentum built.”

That momentum resulted in sweeping legislation overwhelmingly approved by the Republican-dominated Ohio Legislature and signed by Republican Gov. John Kasich last year, pulling back on years of “tough on crime” laws that had caused massive crowding in the state’s prisons and a huge increase in its corrections spending.

Similar efforts are under way in other states, mostly led by conservatives, including some who once hewed to the “lock’em-up-and-throw-away-the-key” attitude.

“It’s almost a tectonic shift,” said Ken Sikkema*, former Republican leader in the Michigan Senate and House. “Even the people who have taken the position that we’ve got to be tough on crime are now saying, ‘We’ve got to be smart on crime.’”

Sikkema, a senior policy fellow at Public Sector Consultants in Lansing, concedes he, too, once supported tougher sentencing laws.

“I had gone along with my party,” he said. “We were going to build more prisons, put people in them and throw away the key.”

That led to a three-fold increase in Michigan’s prison population to 51,000 inmates by 2006. Since then, the number has dropped to about 43,000, but the Department of Corrections’ 2012 budget still is $1.9 billion.

A nascent move is under way in Michigan, too, to re-examine some of the laws that caused that increase, particularly those dealing with juvenile offenders. As the tough-on-crime mantra took hold, Michigan legislators in 1988 and 1996 approved laws giving prosecutors the power to charge juveniles as adults. If convicted, such juveniles can be sentenced to adult prisons.

“What the research shows is when a youth ends up in adult prison, it has much harsher consequences for the youth” and for the community, said Michelle Weemhoff, a senior policy associate at the Michigan Council on Crime and Delinquency.

Removed from their homes and communities and exposed to the more-hardened adult inmates, juveniles are likely to commit more crimes, she said. Weemhoff and her organization are urging lawmakers to consider alternatives to incarceration, including in-home placement for low-risk offenders.

MDOC says it spends, on average, about $33,000 a year for each prison inmate. Incarcerating youths in privately owned juvenile facilities costs about $200 a day, Weemhoff said. Placing youthful offenders in their own homes, where they can be supervised and participate in treatment programs, averages about $10 a day, she added.

In the past, youths were not held to the same standards as adults, because it was assumed they lacked mature judgment. Research over the past 20 years has confirmed that the human brain continues to develop into the early 20s, making juveniles “more impulsive and less likely to use sound judgment,” Weemhoff explained.

The trait that makes them prone to peer pressure also helps them respond to treatment, she said. By increasing funding for in-home placement, Michigan could save money, Weemhoff said. “In the long run, our goal is to see these kids grow up to be productive members of society and taxpayers.

We don’t want to see them in a pipeline to prison. Other states that have implemented these changes have found that these programs actually increase public safety.”

Late last year, Donald Ross, a New York attorney and consultant for a nonprofit called Public Interest Projects, met with Weemhoff and others in Michigan to plant the seeds for juvenile justice reform. His organization has similar efforts under way in a dozen other states.

For some government officials, juvenile justice is a starting point before reconsidering the laws that have put more adults in prison. About 2.3 million Americans – one in every 100 – are behind bars, according to the Pew Center on the States. As in others states, Michigan’s lawmakers passed a series of laws in the 1980s and 1990s imposing mandatory minimum sentences, taking away judges’ discretion, eliminating “good time” points for early release and allowing juveniles to be tried as adults.

“All these things,” Ross said, “conspired to put more people in prison.”

In most states, sentencing reform, long the province of liberals, is being led by conservatives.

Some are motivated by a desire to save money, Ross said, while others “are very focused on saving the kids.”

In Ohio, Sen. Bill Seitz, a Cincinnati Republican, began advocating sentencing reform three years ago, but Democrats in the legislature balked.

“They were a little bit worried about being Willie Hortoned,” or accused of being soft on crime, the ACLU’s Brickner said. Horton, a convicted murderer in Massachusetts, committed more crimes while on furlough, giving Republicans an issue against former Gov. Michael Dukakis in his 1988 presidential campaign.

In the 2010 elections, Ohio Republicans swept both houses of the legislature, and Kasich, a former congressman and Lehman Brothers executive, was elected governor. Last June, he signed a new law diverting first-time, nonviolent offenders to community based programs and allowing inmates to earn early release points by completing educational, vocational and mental health programs.

The new law also restored judges’ discretion to decide when youths should be charged as adults — and it offered alternatives to incarceration for young offenders.

“It was a pleasant surprise for us,” Brickner said. “I don’t mean to wax poetic about our governor, but he has made some good decisions.”

**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Ohio jail closed to violently mentally ill

From CorrectionsOne.com:  http://www.correctionsone.com/correctional-psychology/articles/5052428-Ohio-jail-closed-to-violently-mentally-ill/

By Rick Armon 
Dayton Daily News

Sheriff wants people to be first evaluated at medical facility

SUMMIT COUNTY, Ohio — Summit County Sheriff Drew Alexander plans to announce today that the county jail no longer will accept violent mentally ill and mentally disabled people arrested by area police — perhaps becoming the first facility in the country with such a policy.

"We're not going to be a dumping ground anymore for these people," he said.

The sheriff has long complained that housing the mentally ill and disabled in jail is inhumane, and they belong in a mental hospital where they can be better treated.

For years, he has threatened to stop taking such people if they are violent and until they have been treated first. He is following through now after a federally funded review of mental health programming at the jail.

A consultant working through the National Institute of Corrections recommended this month that those people "be referred to the hospital emergency room or the psychiatric crisis center for evaluation prior to being accepted into the jail."

Alexander, who is active in the National Sheriffs' Association, said he's unaware of any other county with that policy. The association and the National Institute of Corrections couldn't be reached for comment.

Nationwide problem Mentally ill inmates have been a serious problem for jails across the country and there have been nationwide calls for reform. A 2010 report by the Treatment Advocacy Center and National Sheriffs' Association concluded that mentally ill Ohioans are four times more likely to end up in jail or prison instead of a mental hospital.

Local leaders estimated that about 130 inmates - out of more than 600 - are taking psychotropic drugs for mental illness.

The issue erupted publicly here after the 2006 death of inmate Mark D. McCullaugh Jr. after a violent struggle with deputies in his cell in the jail's mental-health unit.

Five deputies were indicted. One deputy was found not guilty of a single count of murder after an eight-day trial. Charges against the others, all facing lesser felonies, were dismissed after the not-guilty verdict.

The new county policy extends only to those who are violent, Alexander said. And the county is not refusing to house them, officials added, just requiring that they be treated before they are booked into the jail.

The policy, designed to improve safety for other inmates and staff, is similar to one in place that requires people with medical emergencies to be treated at an area hospital first.

"Our intention is not to turn away each and every mentally ill person who commits some kind of crime, especially misdemeanors, and are brought to our jail," jail administrator Gary James said. "The majority get along fine."

The new policy may affect two or three people a week, he estimated.

The change is expected to put pressure on local police departments and create an additional financial burden on communities because they could be responsible for any hospital or treatment bills.

**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org
Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Citizens-for-Prison-Reform/171253319587634

Editorial: Michigan's prisoner re-entry program has proved its worth

From Detroit Free Press:  http://www.freep.com/article/20120218/OPINION01/202180314/Editorial-Michigan-s-prisoner-re-entry-program-has-proved-its-worth

February 18, 2012 

Despite the rants of some prosecutors and several fixable flaws, Michigan's Prisoner Re-Entry Initiative is doing what it's supposed to do: reduce recidivism, and therefore the state's prison population, by helping parolees find jobs, housing, transportation, treatment and other services. A report released this month by the state's Office of the Auditor General found that parolees enrolled in MPRI were significantly less likely to return to prison, where they each cost taxpayers roughly $35,000 a year.

Examining the parole records of nearly 4,500 prisoners released under MPRI in 2007, the audit found that only 6% returned to prison within six months. That compares with 9% of parolees from 1998. After three years out of prison -- the standard period for recidivism tallies -- only a third were back in prison, compared with nearly half before MPRI was up and running statewide in 2007. MPRI was especially effective, the audit found, for prisoners who failed on parole at least once.

Michigan's recidivism rates are still alarmingly high -- but far lower than the national rate of nearly 50%. In fact, a Pew study last year showed Michigan's reported 32% recidivism rate ranking seventh-lowest in the nation. "There's no doubt that Michigan's prisoner re-entry programs have had a lot do with that," said Russ Marlan, administrator of MDOC's executive bureau.

With nearly 10,000 parolees a year from Michigan prisons, lower recidivism rates mean thousands of fewer prisoners and crime victims. MPRI programs have also enabled the state Parole Board to release some prisoners who otherwise would have stayed in prison, Marlan said. Since MPRI began in 2005, the number of prisoners past their earliest release date has dropped from 17,000 to 7,500.

Without question, MPRI, which now receives more than $50 million a year, continues to have problems. The 32-page audit cited a lack of standard reporting procedures and inadequate monitoring. Corrections is working to get better information on how MPRI works, Marlan said, citing a five-year outside contract to evaluate prisoner re-entry programs and procedures.

Perhaps the most serious flaw in the re-entry efforts is one the audit ignores. Big cuts to prison education budgets will mean more inmates leaving prisons ill-equipped to succeed. Ideally, re-entry efforts should start the day an offender enters prison and continue through parole. Diverting MPRI money to beef up in-prison programs the department has already cut will not increase the effectiveness of the overall program.

Even so, Corrections has managed to cut recidivism by one-third, and reduce Michigan's prison population by 8,000 after decades of increases. It accomplished that during one of the nastiest economies since World War II, without an overall increase in state crime rates. That's good news and progress the entire state should acknowledge, including Michigan prosecutors who reflexively resist any change in state prison policies.

**This information is being shared by Citizens for Prison Reform for purely informational purposes.

Citizens for Prison Reform
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"
-Martin Luther King
Website:  www.micpr.org